Thesis: Variable practitioner competence is not an inconvenience, it is the single largest threat to legitimacy, safety, and public trust in psychedelic and spiritually informed care. The psychedelic and spiritual-care fields are standing at a familiar threshold: rapid growth, cultural fascination, and fragile legitimacy. History tells us what comes next. Industries do not collapse because of bad intentions; they collapse because they mistake charisma for competence and belief for skill. Right now, the most dangerous myth circulating in this space is that good intentions plus altered states equal good care. They do not. If we are honest, the greatest risk to clients is not the medicine. It is the practitioner. The Myth of Innate “Holding Capacity” “Holding capacity” has become a flattering euphemism for intuition without discipline. The belief goes something like this: some people are naturally gifted at presence, containment, and spiritual depth, and therefore need less training. This myth is seductive, especially in traditions that valorize awakening experiences or lineage transmission. But capacity is not a personality trait. It is a trained function under stress. True holding emerges when a practitioner can remain regulated while another person dissociates, regresses, rages, or collapses into grief. It shows itself when the room destabilizes, not when everything feels sacred and aligned. Assuming that inner work automatically translates into clinical or spiritual containment is not just naive, it is negligent. In psychotherapy, we learned this lesson the hard way. Empathy without structure burns out practitioners and harms clients. Psychedelic states amplify this risk by orders of magnitude. Weekend Certifications and Spiritual Bypass The industry’s quiet scandal is how quickly authority is conferred. A few weekends. A certificate. A website. Suddenly someone is “facilitating deep transformation.” Short-form trainings are not inherently wrong. The problem is when they substitute for longitudinal development. Many programs teach language, frameworks, and rituals without confronting the practitioner’s unresolved material or stress responses. The result is spiritual bypass dressed up as professionalism. Clients sense this immediately. When a practitioner reflexively reframes trauma as “medicine teaching,” or rushes to meaning-making before nervous systems stabilize, trust erodes. What looks like wisdom is often avoidance. No amount of ceremonial fluency compensates for an inability to tolerate ambiguity, fear, or silence without imposing an interpretation. Skill Decay Without Supervision Competence is perishable. Every field that takes safety seriously accepts this. Surgeons, pilots, psychotherapists, all require ongoing supervision, peer review, and continuing education. Psychedelic and spiritual care is no different, except the industry often behaves as if awakening inoculates against error. It does not. Without supervision, blind spots calcify. Boundary drift becomes normalized. Subtle countertransference goes unchecked until it becomes harm. Practitioners begin practicing alone in echo chambers, mistaking confidence for mastery. Supervision is not a punishment. It is the infrastructure that keeps humility operational. Lessons from Psychotherapy Licensure Failures It is tempting to assume that psychotherapy offers a gold standard. It does not, but its failures are instructive. Licensure did not eliminate misconduct; it merely made patterns visible and accountable. Where supervision was strong, harm decreased. Where it was absent or perfunctory, abuses persisted. The psychedelic field risks repeating early psychotherapy’s mistakes at accelerated speed. Fewer safeguards. Higher intensity states. Less shared language for accountability. The question is not whether regulation will come. It is whether the field will mature before regulation is imposed after harm. What Competent Training Actually Requires Real training is inconvenient. It takes time. It humbles people. It exposes weaknesses that branding prefers to hide. At minimum, competent preparation requires: · Extended supervised practice , not simulated role-play alone · Assessment of practitioner regulation under pressure , not just knowledge recall · Ongoing mentorship and case consultation , not one-time certification · Explicit boundary education , including power, dependency, and transference · Clear pathways for remediation , not silent exclusion or denial Most importantly, it requires a cultural shift: from identity-based authority (“I am called to this work”) to function-based responsibility (“I can demonstrate this capacity reliably”). The Real Cost of Ignoring the Gap Every adverse event, every client harmed, every story whispered but not addressed, erodes public trust. And once trust is lost, it does not return easily. The backlash will not distinguish between good actors and bad structures. It never does. This field has a narrow window to decide what it wants to be known for: transformation with rigor, or inspiration without accountability. Call to Action If you cannot defend your training standards under cross-examination, they are not standards. Not to a journalist. Not to a regulator. Not to a grieving family asking why harm occurred under your watch. Depth without discipline is not wisdom. It is risk .  And the future of this work depends on whether we are willing to say that out loud, now, before someone else says it for us.

This is a subtitle for your new post